Can I add how brilliant I think the official video is?
It's like something Peter Gabriel would do.
Is there any discernible difference between those two versions?jerome wrote:Wow. Never noticed this before. Thanks. Strangely, to my knowledge, this difference does not appear on any french issue.Violator wrote:Credits from the 2nd version:shadow wrote:What different versions? I'm aware of the original pressing that split Second and Fifth Rendez-vous in multiple parts. But I don't recall it actually having a new mixing (minus the missing beat in the fourth track).
[url=http://thumbnails113.imagebam.com/43478/6ca7eb434778331.jpg]Image[/URL]
The difference between 2 versions is in slightly different version of 4th rendez-vous. In the 1st case the track was mixed by Ermelin and Vanzetto. In the 2nd case it was mixed by Kervorkian.
Otherwise, 1st version was mixed by Ermelin and Geiss (not Vanzetto)
For science!RemarkableRadio wrote:Hi guys,
I am always fascinated by fans that are discussing differences in songs of sometimes 1 or 2 seconds. Or if a pitch in one version is different from the other.
I only have all original recordings that I bought when they came out. I have ignored all remasters and rereleases. If I read all the posts about those, I made the right choice.
Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
Because your "basically the same" can be "different enough" to someone else.RemarkableRadio wrote:Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?