Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

Having trouble registering? You can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

ZOOLOOK - 1st Edition


Post Posted Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:29 pm
Jarreshair


Posts: 149

Can I add how brilliant I think the official video is?
It's like something Peter Gabriel would do.

Post Posted Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:36 pm
Dr_Jones


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 3729
Location: Leiden, Netherlands
Likes given: 194
Likes received  : 402

That's Jean-Pierre Jeunet for you.
Post Posted Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:58 pm
shadow


User avatar
Posts: 1511
Likes received  : 35

We really need a Blu-ray with all music videos remastered. Scan the filmstock in at 4K and remaster that and clean the VHS tapes as much as you can and have a note on the disc that quality will vary due too the source.

I'd eat that right up! :nod:
27-11-10: Ahoy Rotterdam
22-11-16: Heineken Music Hall Amsterdam
Post Posted Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:44 pm
Jote


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 1025
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 55
Likes received  : 68

Ok, this deviates from the topic a bit.

There's something that I can't understand about the 2nd (1985) edition. The track listing states:

1. Ethnicolor (11:45)
2. Diva (7:12)

Yet every single CD-rip of this supposed edition that I've ever encountered does not contain tracks of above durations. Ethnicolor is 11:40 (and does not differ from the 1st edition to my knowledge, as opposed to 3rd edition which actually has a couple of extra seconds in the middle) while Diva is 7:30+.

What gives? Is the track listing incorrect?
Post Posted Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:24 pm
shadow


User avatar
Posts: 1511
Likes received  : 35

The three editions of the album that I have are:

1st:
Ethnicolor - 11:42
Diva - 7:32

2nd:
Ethnicolor - 11:40
Diva - 7:33

3rd:
Ethnicolor - 11:47
Diva - 7:20

I guess they just mislabeled the exact length.
27-11-10: Ahoy Rotterdam
22-11-16: Heineken Music Hall Amsterdam
Post Posted Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:44 pm
Jote


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 1025
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 55
Likes received  : 68

Yeah, I pretty much came to the same conclusion, seeing that all copies around the web are like that and there were no extra notes on discogs (or wikipedia) about this. Just wanted to make sure.
Post Posted Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:53 am
Jote


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 1025
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 55
Likes received  : 68

jerome wrote:
Violator wrote:
shadow wrote:What different versions? I'm aware of the original pressing that split Second and Fifth Rendez-vous in multiple parts. But I don't recall it actually having a new mixing (minus the missing beat in the fourth track).
Credits from the 2nd version:
[url=http://thumbnails113.imagebam.com/43478/6ca7eb434778331.jpg]Image[/URL]

The difference between 2 versions is in slightly different version of 4th rendez-vous. In the 1st case the track was mixed by Ermelin and Vanzetto. In the 2nd case it was mixed by Kervorkian.
Wow. Never noticed this before. Thanks. Strangely, to my knowledge, this difference does not appear on any french issue.
Otherwise, 1st version was mixed by Ermelin and Geiss (not Vanzetto)
Is there any discernible difference between those two versions?
Post Posted Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:47 am
RemarkableRadio


Posts: 33
Location: Hong Kong

Hi guys,
I am always fascinated by fans that are discussing differences in songs of sometimes 1 or 2 seconds. Or if a pitch in one version is different from the other.
I only have all original recordings that I bought when they came out. I have ignored all remasters and rereleases. If I read all the posts about those, I made the right choice.
Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
Post Posted Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:52 am
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 2978
Location: Finland
Likes given: 186
Likes received  : 54

Why not? ;)
Post Posted Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:36 pm
Dr_Jones


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 3729
Location: Leiden, Netherlands
Likes given: 194
Likes received  : 402

RemarkableRadio wrote:Hi guys,
I am always fascinated by fans that are discussing differences in songs of sometimes 1 or 2 seconds. Or if a pitch in one version is different from the other.
I only have all original recordings that I bought when they came out. I have ignored all remasters and rereleases. If I read all the posts about those, I made the right choice.
Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
For science!
Post Posted Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:48 pm
Jote


User avatar
Online Now
Posts: 1025
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 55
Likes received  : 68

RemarkableRadio wrote:Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
Because your "basically the same" can be "different enough" to someone else.

I'm pretty sure there are people who would say that Equinoxe V from "800 025-2 01" and "800 025-2 02" is "basically the same"







  • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software