Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

A new server, a new environment. Updated and all.

As with every migration, some things might have been lost in translation (at least, that's my experience in software development). The main problem is logging in into the boards. These could be caused by several reasons:

- Your browser cache & cookies need to be cleared because we moved to a new server. If you get the error message whilst logging: "The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.", you need to clear your cache & cookies. You can find a "Delete cookies" option at the bottom of this page.

- There is also a chance that your password is not correctly converted to the new system. This is a known bug with migrating the system. The only solution is to request a new password, there's a link on the form that will send an email to you to create a new password. If that fails, I can set a password for you, you can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

Jarre's WAITING FOR COUSTEAU album, which synths were used?


Post Posted Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:55 pm
Memory Cords


Posts: 26

Jarre usually lists which synths were used on his album sleeves.

But on WAITING FOR COUSTEAU there is no list.

Does anybody have any reliable information (e.g. magazine articles, interviews with Jarre etc) about what synths were used on this album?

Thanks.
Post Posted Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:48 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8326
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 1

A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
Have a look at my organ music videos (No Jarre yet): www.youtube.com/user/gjmusique
Benedicat vos omni potens Deus. Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus. Amen. BONNE NUIT. :oldman:
Post Posted Mon May 16, 2011 9:19 pm
Memory Cords


Posts: 26

GeeJee wrote:A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
Sorry for the late reply, thanks for that information! I wonder why Jarre didn't list the instruments in the album credits like he usually does?
Post Posted Mon May 16, 2011 10:19 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8326
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 1

Memory Cords wrote:
GeeJee wrote:A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
Sorry for the late reply, thanks for that information! I wonder why Jarre didn't list the instruments in the album credits like he usually does?
That's not always upto JMJ - perhaps someone else decided.
Have a look at my organ music videos (No Jarre yet): www.youtube.com/user/gjmusique
Benedicat vos omni potens Deus. Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus. Amen. BONNE NUIT. :oldman:
Post Posted Tue May 17, 2011 9:51 pm
cygnusx-1


Posts: 32
Location: Germany

GeeJee wrote:A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
I always thought he also used the Kurzweil K2000 on WFC? I recall it was one of his favorite synths during the period WFC/Images/Chronologie. Nevertheless, imho WFC sounds outstanding great.
Post Posted Tue May 17, 2011 9:54 pm
qube


Posts: 98
Location: Leeds, UK

easily the best production quality of all his albums.

shame Chronologie was so compressed by comparison
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 2:50 am
JPQ


Posts: 114

qube wrote:easily the best production quality of all his albums.

shame Chronologie was so compressed by comparison
Funny thing i think opposite Waiting for cousteau is not best. But i think thing is at least little sometihng about taste. No my ears best albums are Equinoxe and Oxygene and then Oxygene 7-13....
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 12:23 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8326
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 1

cygnusx-1 wrote:
GeeJee wrote:A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
I always thought he also used the Kurzweil K2000 on WFC? I recall it was one of his favorite synths during the period WFC/Images/Chronologie. Nevertheless, imho WFC sounds outstanding great.
K2000 was released in 1991, WFC in 1990.. also, I haven't spot any typical Kurzweil sounds. On the Hong Kong and Chronologie albums you can spot them easily.
Have a look at my organ music videos (No Jarre yet): www.youtube.com/user/gjmusique
Benedicat vos omni potens Deus. Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus. Amen. BONNE NUIT. :oldman:
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 6:11 pm
thhedk


Posts: 162

qube wrote:easily the best production quality of all his albums.

shame Chronologie was so compressed by comparison

I must agree, I think it sounds SO good. Many Jarre-fans don't like Calypso 1, I love it.
Cool Bass, both normal bass and the sequenced
Super cool drums, especially in the remix.

Calypso II have some nice bass and drum sounds/hits
Calyso III , well not my favorit, but still ok sweet melody
Waiting for C. - I never understood this. Ok to do a 45 min song, but he could have played some more in it!

I have never liked Chronologie - all too noisy and digital with all that church organ sounds :roll:

But hey, taste can't be discussed :)
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 7:03 pm
cygnusx-1


Posts: 32
Location: Germany

GeeJee wrote:
cygnusx-1 wrote:
GeeJee wrote:A lot of Synthex, D50, Korg m1, t3 and Fairlight CMI IIx.

source
I always thought he also used the Kurzweil K2000 on WFC? I recall it was one of his favorite synths during the period WFC/Images/Chronologie. Nevertheless, imho WFC sounds outstanding great.
K2000 was released in 1991, WFC in 1990.. also, I haven't spot any typical Kurzweil sounds. On the Hong Kong and Chronologie albums you can spot them easily.
Thanks for the info.
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 9:50 pm
qube


Posts: 98
Location: Leeds, UK

JPQ wrote:
qube wrote:easily the best production quality of all his albums.

shame Chronologie was so compressed by comparison
Funny thing i think opposite Waiting for cousteau is not best. But i think thing is at least little sometihng about taste. No my ears best albums are Equinoxe and Oxygene and then Oxygene 7-13....
I wasn't talking about the quality of the music just the production. The earlier albums are more interesting musically but sound thin.

7-13 and Chron' are very compressed and distorted don't sound nice at all which is a shame as I like the music.
Post Posted Wed May 18, 2011 11:14 pm
JPQ


Posts: 114

qube wrote:
JPQ wrote:
qube wrote:easily the best production quality of all his albums.

shame Chronologie was so compressed by comparison
Funny thing i think opposite Waiting for cousteau is not best. But i think thing is at least little sometihng about taste. No my ears best albums are Equinoxe and Oxygene and then Oxygene 7-13....
I wasn't talking about the quality of the music just the production. The earlier albums are more interesting musically but sound thin.

7-13 and Chron' are very compressed and distorted don't sound nice at all which is a shame as I like the music.

To my ears. old albums sounds warm. and Oxygene 7-13 is sitll own way hardlisten like Chrologie maybe is this compression i dont konw. Becouse many over compressed pop albums are have sound something what i dont like actually hate. And i dont talk poor melodies,shitty synths,and awfull vocals.
Post Posted Sun Jun 07, 2015 9:14 pm
Polarity


User avatar
Posts: 111
Location: Milano (Italy)

I bring back this old topic because I'm interested in replicating one sound of Calypso part 2.

That kind of click/snap/snack that you can hear in repetition at about 2.20 - 2.28 - 2.35 - 2.44
an so on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQsjTbWDln0

if these
> AKAI S1000
> FAIRLIGHT CMI-II
> ARP 2600
> ELKA Synthex
> KORG T3
> ROLAND D-50
> ROLAND SH-101
are the instruments he used on the album, what could have used for doing it?

In 1989-90 I remember to have heard almost the same sound coming from the Waldorf Microwave 1: I was in a music instruments store, but it wasn't me playing the synth in that moment... but that sound just impressed in my memory.
Never had a Microwave in my hands again, so I don't know how it was done (could be a wavetable trick beside analog filter manipulation?)

Please, any suggestion on what kind of synth is best to try and on what parameters work most for obtaining the same power of the snap?
Thank you in advance.
Post Posted Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:00 am
Analog-Umph


User avatar
Posts: 575
Location: Sydney, Australia
Likes given: 1

Polarity wrote:Please, any suggestion on what kind of synth is best to try and on what parameters work most for obtaining the same power of the snap?
We must all work together towards obtaining the power of the snap, for that is the path to becoming masters of the universe! :peacemaan:
Without faith nothing is possible. With it, nothing is impossible.
Post Posted Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:19 pm
Pete


User avatar
Posts: 92

If I understand correctly, the sound you are looking at could be coming from the Dynacord ADD-One. It has analog resonant filters and it is regarded as one of the best drum samplers of all time. You can spot it in JMJ studio in several pictures of that period.

In the early 90s I remember Roland S-550/S-330/W-30 library had some similar sounds programmed by heavily filtering a snare or tom sample.

You could try to sample the snare drum from the first bars of London Kid (Dynacord ADD-one - if I am not wrong) envelope out some of the gated reverb and apply a low pass filter experimenting with resonance and see if you get close. Try also to move the starting point of the sample to get the right transient.

P.







  • cron
    2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software
     

     

    cron