It is the wider audience who consider. Not necessary come up with kubrick if someone says other than you.Dr_Jones wrote:Are you serious? Or is this a bad trolling attempt? Are you pulling a Kubrick? All of the aforementioned?Robi wrote:Compared to this, he brought a bited Oxygene skull with bad sound system and a minimal spectacle. Rightfully, wider audience would ask themselves: "why should i pay again for his concert, when lately he delivered a minimal performance"?
It's like saying in 1984: "oh, the last time Jarre used analogue synths, I probably won't buy Zoolook".
Or:
"oh, the last JMJ album sold one copy, I probably won't buy Zoolook."
bad sound system, somewhere. Here in Budapest it wasn't the best.
Don't misunderstand me. i did like this concept, but for smaller venues!!
A non-Jarre fan who still likes his music, first hear about the concert, he went to see an arena spectacle.


