You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me. Please don't say anything Jean Michel would do I would like because that has never been the issue. Jean Michel has integrity. You don't like it then return it.Memory Cords wrote:Fuck the loudness war... I'm sick of these badly mastered CD's that have been released over the last 5 years. I can actually hear digital distortion on many recent 'professionally' mastered albums on major labels. Where is the integrity?

Hmmm... If I remember well, even T&T did better...Pat Gleeson wrote:Not bad - for an umpteenth compilation - it remains to be seen where it will be next week, but all in all not a bad chart placing
T&T was a new JMJ album, this is yet another compilation. The prime reason for buying this was the rarities - not high on the casual buyers list, and it's casual buyers who boost chart placings.Dv_ wrote: Hmmm... If I remember well, even T&T did better...![]()
Sigh. Once again it has nothing to do with opinion.Kanta wrote:You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me.
I love Jean Michel Jarre. Seriously. To be honest, discovering and listening to his music has been one of the best experiences of my life. I mean that sincerely.Kanta wrote:You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me. Please don't say anything Jean Michel would do I would like because that has never been the issue. Jean Michel has integrity. You don't like it then return it.
First of all, it's a bloody circle, ofcourse they will look alot like eachotherKanta wrote:You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me. Please don't say anything Jean Michel would do I would like because that has never been the issue. Jean Michel has integrity. You don't like it then return it.
[]Image[]
Well I bought all albums remasterd, figuring out that Jarre would think about these remaster's and not have them take part in this stupid war... I'm tracking and buying all the original CD releases right now, so all Albums will be double in my collectionMemory Cords wrote:My comment is aimed at whoever it is at these labels who is responsible for these mastering problems that have affected many CDs (not just by Jarre but by many, many artists). The Dreyfus Jarre remasters are a perfect example of what I'm talking about. I would just like the labels to treat the artist's music with the respect it deserves.
This is exactly why I still love vinyl records, why they're the best way to really enjoy new music and why this zoombie like brain dead music industry should never stop making new vinyls!shadow wrote:First of all, it's a bloody circle, ofcourse they will look alot like eachotherKanta wrote:You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me. Please don't say anything Jean Michel would do I would like because that has never been the issue. Jean Michel has integrity. You don't like it then return it.
[]Image[]
Second, ofcourse we like it, the rarities CD sounds excilent for their age, but there are just a couple of problems with the remastering of both disc's (and not just Jarre's music, but almost the entire industry on that note). I agree they sound good overall speaking, but I am a real audioholic (or Audiophile as the term is technically), and there are a couple of clear problems with these new Remasters to my ears, and many other audiophile's I know who I demonstrated this package to. The audio volume on the disc itself has been pushed exactly onto the limit itself (0dB), now this isn't really a major problem useally, aslong as there aren't any peaks in the tracks. But on a couple of tracks there are peaks, and by pushing the entire track right onto the volume limit of 0dB (which BTW should always be max -1dB, as 0 is already overdoing it), that peak get's cut of, causing the dynamic of that part of the music to be sacrificed in order to push the volume up. But the biggest problem with this idea is, that all music players come with a volume button, that's what's it's ment to do, and you should be the person to decided how loud the volume is, and not the Audio Designer.
This video show's and explaing perfectly what I'm saying![]()
Both.Analog-Umph wrote:Sigh. Once again it has nothing to do with opinion.Kanta wrote:You are entitled to your opinion but it sounds good to me.
Kanta please listen to Equinoxe 4 on the original album. Then listen to the Essential's version of the track. Do them both on headphones. Adjust the volume on both to comfortable levels.
While you listen, single out each and every sound and also listen to the tracks as a whole.
Which version sounds better?
Because Calypso 2 is only his best song ever.chronos wrote:what's so "essential" about the arse end of Calypso 2 ???