Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:18 pm
by Velodynamic
GeeJee wrote:To be really honest I wouldn't mind if they'd shoot one at the US. But that may sound really freaked out and many civilians could get killed and all that, but still... and then the US can shoot an XL Nuke in return and all the trouble ends... or perhaps them Russians will dig them 40 year old missiles and try to should the US and we can have a Second Cold War. But then again that sounds like a bad fairytale, so: they lived happily ever after.
Did this make any sense? No. Never mind
That's allmost as good as saying..."let's wipe out this whole fucked up world of people
and let the jurassic park rule all over again".
Ok...I know this is serious. I just couldn't help it.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:20 pm
by Finaero
If I wanted nukes, I'd rather play Civilization IV or
Defcon.
Or some old-school C&C Red Alert.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:43 pm
by Jarp2600
Wuargh!
That's the only I can say about this. Can't understand people who want to do research of world-destroying weapons!
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:58 pm
by Vieon
Finaero wrote:If I wanted nukes, I'd rather play Civilization IV or
Defcon.
Or some old-school C&C Red Alert.
DAMN, you play DEFCON? I gotta play with you sometime dude.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:02 pm
by Vieon
GeeJee wrote:To be really honest I wouldn't mind if they'd shoot one at the US. But that may sound really freaked out and many civilians could get killed and all that, but still... and then the US can shoot an XL Nuke in return and all the trouble ends... or perhaps them Russians will dig them 40 year old missiles and try to should the US and we can have a Second Cold War. But then again that sounds like a bad fairytale, so: they lived happily ever after.
Did this make any sense? No. Never mind
Yeah. NK can only technically hit Alaska, so if they hit (fingers crossed) a non-populated area, then maybe that may spur the US into invading. Which would be worthwhile. I mean, I'm a lefty and all, but I hate the dictatorship there.