Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:45 pm
by Livgivare
and for the Girls:
I give you Marcus Schenkenberg!
Love Leelene
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:57 pm
by GeeJee
That's very modest breasts. Not my taste, sorry...

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:57 pm
by Velodynamic
He really should need a top.

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:48 pm
by Jakob BC
Antigoon wrote:Sweden has porn?
I didn't know that (seriously, I've never seen swedisch pr0n...)
A small bird told me that there is a famous pr0n girl called Puma Swede who is from Sweden

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:33 pm
by Kanta
Livgivare wrote:and for the Girls:
Image
I give you Marcus Schenkenberg!
Love Leelene

, thank you.
I would post a pic of JMJ's torso but can't seem to think where they are. Anyway, he's not Sweden so that's beside the point

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:47 pm
by Antigoon
let me get this straight..
The whole point of bara bröst was that female species should be allowed to have their breasts seen, for equality sake..
Since we now see a picture of a male without a shirt, does this now also mean (for the sake of equality) that I can post a pic of a girl with no top on?
Just checking before Geejee bans me here since him being from the bible belt and all he might not dig that.
So Geejee, can I show such a pic, and if no could you please delete the picture above for equality sake?

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:58 am
by GeeJee
Whatever pleases you, dude. I don't mind.
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:09 am
by Velodynamic
Bra...no, no bra...pornolution?
How come this be so much about sweden?
Doesn't girls have boobs in other countries??

I don't get it.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:48 am
by mathetes1963
I believe this particular topic has just become off-limits for me.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:26 am
by Antigoon
mathetes1963 wrote:I believe this particular topic has just become off-limits for me.

I think you're completely missing the point "bara bröst" is trying to make...
Bare chests are not sexual at all, it is the viewer that sometimes makes it about sex...
Well, since Geejee said it was OK I (much in the style of Leelene I give you:)
Ludivine Sagnier
For me without a doubt a fine example of why showing your boobs is not offensive, just look at them
And for those nitpicking on JMJ relevence... This picture is from a scene from the movie "Swimming pool" (with Charlotte Rampling, by many this movie is considered art...)
Also again I would like to point out the relevence of a swimmingpool with this very subject about Sweden

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:20 pm
by Velodynamic
Oh...I see now, it's a
swedish feminism campaign! that has this idea.
I was too tired to see the connection last night and didn't really read the washington post article properly.
Sorry 'bout that.
Funny though I haven't heard a single word about this before.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:23 pm
by AnDrOiD
Natural breats: Great!
Fake plastic tits: Awful!
Young dudes won't agree, but you will when you mature.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:29 pm
by AnDrOiD
Btw... I hope I didn't offend any girls/women in here.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:30 pm
by Antigoon
AnDrOiD wrote:Natural breats: Great!
Fake plastic tits: Awful!
Young dudes won't agree, but you will when you mature.

Hmm, I kinda expected the opposite of that from an android...
Not that I disagree though, silicone ones just don't feel as good as real ones

(although I am prepared to to some extra research...)
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:36 pm
by Kanta
Okay, I am not coming in this topic. It's all too much for me.
