Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:28 am
I know I'm portraying it black and white and quite extreme. In that way I hope you can see what I think about the ridicoulous 'rule' that one can't have a 'jarre mimes yes/no'-thread. It makes you wonder where is the line? Future will tell ofcource. I just have the feeling it's going the same direction as the jarrenet forum in the last weeks before it died. I'm just one of those who don't like rules. I feel being closed in a (La) Cage. Bottom line here is I won't join there.
@littlesis: Yes, there must be rules. They are called 'common sense'. Unfortunately not all of us posses the same ruleset. As for "who really wants to hear themselves being possibly criticised or ripped to pieces by others": I do! Critize me please. Debunk me. That's what freedom of speech is all about.
@Cousteau: I did read the (now old) rulez. I don't like them.
UPDATE: They have been changed to: http://jarreforum.com/showthread.php?t=46 Fortunately the restriction of the 'jarre mimes or not'-thread has been removed. Thanks for that. I still don't like the "If anyone feels that a member is trading BOOTLEG material of the above, please inform a Moderator or Administrator immediately."-rule. I don't want to be the one who is betraying his/her friends. But all in all it's better acceptable then the previous version.
@Big time: The vote is nothing more then a choise between freedom or dictatorship. Look at recent events in Belarus and there are more examples. Democracy is not perfect, but there is nothing better (yet).
@Chris: Is the posting of a 'does jarre mimes'-thread a treath to the safety?
@AMR:
@Vieon: I have doubts about the relation between Aero Prod & JarreUK. JarreUK always shroud new info in mist, avoid questions and act if they know all. Yet most of us already know the info before it's being thold by them! Why the evasive actions? Why not simply tell when asked? Do they ever think of the possibillity that more ppl have direct lines to jmj then just them?
I know I can be a pain in the ass sometimes but rebels are neccecairy to get noses pointing in the same direction.
J.
@littlesis: Yes, there must be rules. They are called 'common sense'. Unfortunately not all of us posses the same ruleset. As for "who really wants to hear themselves being possibly criticised or ripped to pieces by others": I do! Critize me please. Debunk me. That's what freedom of speech is all about.
@Cousteau: I did read the (now old) rulez. I don't like them.
UPDATE: They have been changed to: http://jarreforum.com/showthread.php?t=46 Fortunately the restriction of the 'jarre mimes or not'-thread has been removed. Thanks for that. I still don't like the "If anyone feels that a member is trading BOOTLEG material of the above, please inform a Moderator or Administrator immediately."-rule. I don't want to be the one who is betraying his/her friends. But all in all it's better acceptable then the previous version.
@Big time: The vote is nothing more then a choise between freedom or dictatorship. Look at recent events in Belarus and there are more examples. Democracy is not perfect, but there is nothing better (yet).
@Chris: Is the posting of a 'does jarre mimes'-thread a treath to the safety?
@AMR:
@Vieon: I have doubts about the relation between Aero Prod & JarreUK. JarreUK always shroud new info in mist, avoid questions and act if they know all. Yet most of us already know the info before it's being thold by them! Why the evasive actions? Why not simply tell when asked? Do they ever think of the possibillity that more ppl have direct lines to jmj then just them?
I know I can be a pain in the ass sometimes but rebels are neccecairy to get noses pointing in the same direction.
J.
