Finaero wrote:I'm sorry, but I think the Place de la Concorde videotape is one of the saddest releases ever. Note that I haven't seen it but from what I've understood, the entire "gig" has been filmed inside a dark studio with some live footage spliced in at times.
What is sad about it? Clearly it does not pretend to be a concert film. For whatever reasons, they decided to make something else, what they called a video concert. In this context, "video" refers to video graphics, video effects, digital editing, which was new at that time, and I 100% convinced that Jarre saw this new medium of video graphics as another way to visualise his music. Kinda a visual version of his music; it has the same abstractness, the same flowing style, the same morphing quality. It is only sad if you think of it as a concert documentary - but it isnt!
Today, people flock to art galleries to witness video graphics, and now it's called "video installation". I am pretty sure JMJ's video - relaased in a time when home video wasnt even big yet - was concieved as a video installation, or audio-visual abstract art. The description on the VHS cover also supports this.
You may have to see the video to understand this - just dont judge it as a concert recording. Because it isnt. It would be like judging any Jarre album in an Unplugged competition.