BlahBlahCafe - Jean-Michel Jarre forum

matt222 wrote:Kanta,

As you are an adoring female fan of Jean Michel, I am curious as to your opinions regarding his latest youthful image. Do you think he's on top form with his current look or do you prefer a look from his past ? Personally, I think his hair ages him.

If so, could you give a photographic example. Odd request I know, but I am interested.

Thank you for your endless contributions to the photo collection by the way.

I like all his looks, past and present. Short, long or even bold hair would not change his looks, personality and charisma. There is just something about him.

I have a soft spot for these photos: http://www.jmturpin.com/index.php?query=Jarre . But 101% I love all of his photos.

You are very welcome to all the photos I have shared since joining the forum. I really get a buzz in finding and looking at his photos. I know this may not sound right but I am not crazy.

Pat Gleeson wrote:

Kanta wrote: They may seem personal but I enjoyed them. But still very guilty about the privacy and the paparazzi.

You have nothing to be guilty about.

I hate the invasion of privacy the Paparazzi practice, but the photos have been taken and they are quite touching and not too invasive. If anyone's at fault it's those photographers - but that's the price of celebrity. Just look at what Jade Goody's going through - even if she to this day courts publicity.

Thanxs Pat for backing me up about the guilt trip.

I think there is a limit to what photos the paparazzi should take and publish.

Mrs K, I wouldn't feel guilty for posting those images up. Afterall, you didn't take them so there is nothing to feel guilty about.

As for his hair. Personally, I think he is just mimiking his wife and trying to keep up with her youthfull looks.

Bad Kanta... bad bad Kanta!

Thanxs .

Thanxs Jon but whoever took the photos got some nice shots. There is a line to stalking and taking good photos.

Just to balance things out. Here are 2 photos taken with permission:

Anyone got a good sized scan/image of the Jarre/Kurzweil advert?

Jon wrote:Image

Thanxs for posting this clipping. Those were the good days when Royalty had class and taste.

Jon wrote:Anyone got a good sized scan/image of the Jarre/Kurzweil advert?

It's on Phil's website here.

Kanta wrote:

Jon wrote:Anyone got a good sized scan/image of the Jarre/Kurzweil advert?

It's on Phil's website here.

Thanks Mrs K, but I already have that one. I was looking for a much bigger version, or the english release

Okay Jon. I knew something was quite not right.

well, I must say - quite fabulous pictures in the last posts thanks Bucedli and Kanta, for sharing About the paparazzi pics... well, although I hate the idea of intruding over one's privacy, such pictures are inevitable, methinks, what with him being famous and his wife being a celebrity as well. Curiosity is human, after all... the best we can do is hope than no one gets a clear (photographic) shot to his bathroom or anything - that would be plain rude from the photographer's part... Kanta, no need to feel guilty about the pics It wasn't you who took the photos or stalked the two of them and the pics were floating on the internet anyway so...

Thanxs lahavana for your kind words. But I can't help in thinkin that I enjoyed the photos too much. When I think of the paparazzi, I always think of Princess Diana.

ralf wrote:Image

Thanxs Ralf. Nice of you to post a photo of JMJ. Must be one of your favorite ones, as well as your avatar.

Although I do agree that paparazzi are a pain in the neck and I really resent their locust-like attitude, no need to blame yourself for those pics. If the photographer HAD got a clear shot inside their house, for example, and you'd have actually been OK with that, then, well, that would have been a problem, yeah. But the two of them were in a public space. A shop. You could have been there yourself and seen them by coincidence if your timing (and placing) were right So don't worry so much.

P.S. however, some paparazzi's do really deserve some healthy lens-smacking for their nosy attitudes.

Nicely said, lahavana.