Page 25 of 105
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:55 am
by Jon
At 10 mins, it is far too short. But I'm thankful we will get something on those lines of a nice presentation of his gear.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:03 am
by Finaero
Equinoxe5 wrote:
Just a thought, but the 'Pigeon Trailor', something tells me that the sounds you hear on that are taken from the instrument presentation, and just mixed together to make a track for the trailor - any thoughts anyone?
Perhaps, my first thought was that it could be part of the Intro before Oxygene 1. But it would somewhat make more sense in the instrument presentation context.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:43 am
by GeeJee
Equinoxe5 wrote:At 10 mins, it is far too short. But I'm thankful we will get something on those lines of a nice presentation of his gear.
10 minutes is a LOT of talking
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:00 pm
by Jon
GeeJee wrote:Equinoxe5 wrote:At 10 mins, it is far too short. But I'm thankful we will get something on those lines of a nice presentation of his gear.
10 minutes is a LOT of talking
I hope not, we want to hear the machines, not have someone talking over them
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:18 pm
by Kanta
If there will be talking which I expect so maybe, that “someone†will be JMJ.
Maybe a possibility for talking and at the same time presentation of the instruments. Or in between, talking, stop, playing, stop, talking, stop etc.
But then again playing the instruments in one long track sounds pretty impressive to me.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:57 pm
by AnDrOiD
Equinoxe5 wrote:FANTASTIC news
Just a thought, but the 'Pigeon Trailor', something tells me that the sounds you hear on that are taken from the instrument presentation, and just mixed together to make a track for the trailor - any thoughts anyone?
As I've said before... I think it's when they tune the old ladies.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:10 pm
by AnDrOiD
I think the CD simply ought to be called "Oxygene 2007" with a sticker saying "30th Anniversary 2007 Re-recording", as with Mike Oldfields "Tubular Bells 2003".
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:49 pm
by AnDrOiD
Something like this (with the real fonts, of course):
What do you think?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:53 pm
by Jon
or OXYGENE @ 30 - OXYGENE: 30 YEARS LATER - NOT ANOTHER OXYGENE - MORE OXYGENE - OXYGENE: CONTINUED - I NEED MORE OXYGENE - OXYGENE: THE RETURN - A RETURN TO OXYGENE - HAPPY BIRTHDAY OXYGENE - etc, etc, etc
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:01 pm
by jp8000
Or Oxygene -the ultimate cashmachine
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:13 pm
by Jakob BC
Well Im just glad that the title isn't Oxygene 3D or Oxygene 2007. I always thought that looked cheap and commercialized
Numbers doesn't fit on an album cover unless it's Oxygene 7-13 or singles split in parts like Oxygene, Equinoxe etc.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:22 pm
by AnDrOiD
Yeah, yeah... sorry, just because the Oxygene fever has finally got me.
I think Oxygene 7-13 is a horrible name for an album. It doesn't have to state, on the cover, that it is Part 7-13 .
Is the original called Oxygene 1-6? No!
And the name on the tracks miss the Part... ehm... part.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:34 pm
by Jakob BC
So it's a matter of taste
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:37 pm
by Jarp2600
Analog-Umph wrote:
I just used my 'Dinosaurs!' 3-D glasses to look at this picture, and while everything turns to red and green, the picture does become 3-D'ish. And if I move from side to side, the background intruments move, where as with a normal picture, nothing happens of course.
Too bad it doesn't work with my Imac night glasses
