Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 5:29 pm
Yes, the files are much bigger.jarrepaul wrote:Ok thank you guys for clearing that up. I take it the file size is much bigger then. Is this why it's put onto a dvd.
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/
Yes, the files are much bigger.jarrepaul wrote:Ok thank you guys for clearing that up. I take it the file size is much bigger then. Is this why it's put onto a dvd.
I listened to the MP3s that have been leaked, and that track sounds like someone has tried to mask repetitive vinyl crackle. There's a constant bassy distortion sound in the background. More likely to notice on headphones than speakers.Quicky wrote:Being an audio dummie, I'm just curious. How do you notice/confirm/know such a thing?bcass wrote:That specific track either came from the vinyl or the master is damaged, because there are defects in the audio.
Steady on !Kanta wrote: I can't concentrate on the English subtitles and watch Jean Michel at the same time.![]()
I have it the same way! The rarities are too old and weird for my taste.Jon wrote:I hope my interests in Jarre's music is not waning. But after 30 years, I just cannot get that excited about this release
Judging from the youtube-Clip, it's a highly improved sound quality. Sounded to me, as if it was recorded presently with the instruments from that time.thhedk wrote:I have it the same way! The rarities are too old and weird for my taste.Jon wrote:I hope my interests in Jarre's music is not waning. But after 30 years, I just cannot get that excited about this release
The essential, well isn't that just the same tracks we have already?
Indeed. I would have preferred decent and well done 5.1-editions though, just like Depeche Mode did with their back catalogue. But since 5.1 doesn't seem to really make it on the market, high audio resolution is highly appreciated, too.thhedk wrote: The news about 96kHz/24bit though, THAT I like)
Ok, Well I will buy it no matter whatCatte wrote:
Judging from the youtube-Clip, it's a highly improved sound quality. Sounded to me, as if it was recorded presently with the instruments from that time.
For a replicate nerd like me, some instruments isolated in the surround channels, would be perfect, but I dont think the music experience is that great - too messy somehowCatte wrote: Indeed. I would have preferred decent and well done 5.1-editions though, just like Depeche Mode did with their back catalogue. But since 5.1 doesn't seem to really make it on the market, high audio resolution is highly appreciated, too.
I can't imagine a better place for such a concert, so a BD release from that could be nice.Catte wrote: If everything goes well and JMJ is content with it, I highly expect the Monaco concert to be released on DVD/BluRay (however, I have heard no rumours about that yet, it's my personal conclusion, after the other DVD/BR-release has been canceled). It's a mega event, it is a world wide known occasion, so it can be easiliy marketed, and it will be filmed for and shown on TV anyway. I don't expect Monaco to be done in 3D, but who knows.
Thank you for your support, Pat.Pat Gleeson wrote:Steady on !Kanta wrote: I can't concentrate on the English subtitles and watch Jean Michel at the same time.![]()
Kanta wrote: Thank you for your support, Pat.
Funny... I have to agree with you. I actually cancelled my pre-order. Just totally uninspired by this. Feels like an excuse to not release a new album and extend an already long-winded tour.GeeJee wrote:I'm not ordering anything. Might pick up a copy when they're in the bargain bins