Hehe, I think somewhere between those words is a big compliment to JMJ's music.Christophe wrote:Since then when I saw mud I think to Jarre's music...![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Hehe, I think somewhere between those words is a big compliment to JMJ's music.Christophe wrote:Since then when I saw mud I think to Jarre's music...![]()
![]()
![]()
.
jeanbatman wrote:Besides the rumba finale, which is very "off-electronic music", it is a great album.
He renewed his tyle by using new technologies like "samplers". Part 1 is an out-of-mind sequence madness with beautiful landscapes and a smash end (Why didn't he allow himself to split it in two parts ?). One of his best-ever tracks.
Part 2 is a fun tune, the first one I played on synth. Part 3 and 4 are magic, taking the course of the Oxygène first half.
The cover photograph is a bit boring, compared to the two original masterpieces.
I've read in the french sleave that Magnetic fields was in billboards in all 3 jazz, pop and classical charts for the United States. (Source : John Tobler, 1997) Is that true ?
