Vieon wrote:Dear God... this is what happens when you try to uncover the truth. You get laughed at as a fraud and then sent off to be 'dealt with'.
First off, that story sucked loud, the guy wanted to try "hoow far he could get" (even disturbing Columbia flightplan), and the community turned down on him, so he's making stories to appear as Robin Hood.
Second, insert your favourite prison name to get an ear/eye-catching story, the site alone makes the article very plausible...
Third, everything else with the story is completely insane- the "evidence" he suggest is russian craft that NASA got attention in in early nineties. The craft is designed to use air pillow to fly just few meters above the water- in conception it was designed as low-cost alternative to shuttles (the water ones). The "big thing" would go as fast as 300 km/h.
NASA is involved in many such projects, like co-participating with Boeing and Tubolev, design of hypersoniic aircraft (using Tu-144 as a testbed).
...and there's a subtle difference between stating a fact and not giving a f*** about it (AMR)
[size=9:cc9f030a25]In: Wavestation, K3m, CS01, DX100, TX802, TG77, VZ-10m, CS1x, D-550, U-220, S2000, S1100, PSS-790, CR-78,
In queue: VL70m, Fairlight CMI series III
[/size:cc9f030a25]
