I like all his looks, past and present. Short, long or even bold hair would not change his looks, personality and charisma. There is just something about him.matt222 wrote:Kanta,
As you are an adoring female fan of Jean Michel, I am curious as to your opinions regarding his latest youthful image. Do you think he's on top form with his current look or do you prefer a look from his past ? Personally, I think his hair ages him.
If so, could you give a photographic example. Odd request I know, but I am interested.
Thank you for your endless contributions to the photo collection by the way.
I have a soft spot for these photos: http://www.jmturpin.com/index.php?query=Jarre . But 101% I love all of his photos.
You are very welcome to all the photos I have shared since joining the forum. I really get a buzz in finding and looking at his photos. I know this may not sound right but I am not crazy.
Thanxs Pat for backing me up about the guilt trip.Pat Gleeson wrote:You have nothing to be guilty about.Kanta wrote: They may seem personal but I enjoyed them. But still very guilty about the privacy and the paparazzi.![]()
I hate the invasion of privacy the Paparazzi practice, but the photos have been taken and they are quite touching and not too invasive. If anyone's at fault it's those photographers - but that's the price of celebrity. Just look at what Jade Goody's going through - even if she to this day courts publicity.
I think there is a limit to what photos the paparazzi should take and publish.


