it is clear and at least leaves no doubt.Dr_Jones wrote: Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:31 pm Haha, that's golden! I have made screenshots to prove otherwise.
That they are a bunch of s**thead "audiophiles" who might genuinely believe this idiocy. They might also believe that repackaging a 44/16 file as 48/24 does in fact affect the content.nexxxus wrote: Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:00 pm Just received a new message from Qobuz quite hallucinating and which suggests that gapless is subjective
"Hello,
Thank you for your message.
After listening again on our side, we understand what you want to say in your first message by the lack of naturalness of the transitions, however these are gapless on our side. The problem mentioned here seems to us to be a problem linked to the feeling rather than to the technique unfortunately.
Cordially"
how to understand it?
Jote wrote: Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:01 pm That they are a bunch of s**thead "audiophiles" who might genuinely believe this idiocy. They might also believe that repackaging a 44/16 file as 48/24 does in fact affect the content.
These are the whole tracks, the gaps are posted earlier in this thread: