




10/10/2018
Via Medium
DESTINATION DOCKLANDS
THE STORY OF JEAN MICHEL-JARRE’S 1988 LONDON SPECTACLE
Article:





BTW: clever use of Derek Jarman and Jean-Michel's last name.In 1968, amongst the cacophony of student protests (internet fan message boards talk of lost TV footage showing Jarre being handcuffed and thrown into a police van),
Yes it's true.Finaero wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:09 pm If I remember correctly, that art was actually used in the original 1988 Docklands programme (as opposed to the bootleg Docklands programme, which featured the Revolutions cover).
Anybody know if the four red, yellow, green, blue abstract colours on the original simple artwork are meant to represent anything?Dr_Jones wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 4:06 pm I like the simple aesthetic of the 1989 cover but yeah, you don't really know what concert it is from. But out of these 3, I think I like the 3rd most. The 2014-2015 remasters might not have been very good, but the artwork/CD booklets of most of the remastered albums are really good.


I disagree. I think it's a very well written article, effectively capturing the complexities of an event that had significant cultural, political and artistic impact. A civic 'happening' on the scale of Destination Docklands - that took place in that location and at that time - reaches deep into series of interlinked spaces. Will Jenning's writings comes from a left-leaning point of view, and he is often critical of the neo-liberal remaking of the city. This article reflects his positions on these topics, and places Jean-Michel Jarre's concert into a socio-political context. But it does so (I think) in an interesting and connected way, illuminating the reader around the wider ideas and related issues.docklands88 wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 10:13 pm I can't even begin to describe how poorly that article is written. I've never seen such meandering, non-sensical rubbish in all my life. I'm a professional, published copywriter and if I submitted a piece like that I'd be laughed at and fired. Granted, there are some interesting points in the piece however he keeps getting off topic and introducing things that bear little to no relevance to the point of the article. It's so hard to read.